Look at the base of your index finger, on the Mount of Jupiter, and you may find a short curved marking tracing part of the way around it. Fewer named markings in this area of the hand have their own dedicated coverage than the four major lines do, but at least two classical Western authors gave this particular one a name of its own: the Ring of Solomon.

This article covers what two verified classical sources — Cheiro and William Benham — say about the marking’s location and traditional associations, and where their accounts overlap and diverge. It draws only on those two sources. If you’re new to the mounts or to the palm’s secondary markings as a category, the Mount of Jupiter article and the minor lines overview provide useful context before reading further.

Where to find it

Cheiro, in Palmistry for All (1916), places the Ring of Solomon on the Mount of Jupiter — the fleshy rise at the base of the index finger — and illustrates it there as a distinct, named marking in his plates. His text situates the marking on the mount without describing its exact path in detail.

Benham, in The Laws of Scientific Hand Reading (1900), gives the more specific geometry. He describes the Ring of Solomon as a minor line that begins in the web between the index (Jupiter) and middle (Saturn) fingers, curves downward around the Mount of Jupiter, and ends near where the life line begins. Where this article describes the marking’s path, that description follows Benham’s account specifically, since Cheiro’s text does not provide a comparable level of detail.

How cautiously to identify it

Because only one of the two verified sources gives a specific arc, treat identification as source-attributed rather than as a universally documented shape. If a marking near your Mount of Jupiter doesn’t clearly follow the path Benham described — starting between the index and middle fingers, curving around the mount, ending near the life line’s beginning — it may be a different feature entirely, or simply an unnamed crease that appears on this part of the hand without carrying a specific traditional name. Not every mark on the Mount of Jupiter is a Ring of Solomon.

What Cheiro and Benham associated it with

Within his own historical system, Cheiro connected the Ring of Solomon to mysticism and occultism — specifically, an aspiration toward mastery or adeptship in those subjects.

Benham, working independently and describing the marking within his own system, associated it with an interest in occult studies, along with potential proficiency in them when other features of the hand — what he called chirognomic indications — also supported that reading. Benham’s own phrasing makes this conditional rather than a standalone claim; his text does not specify which other indications would qualify.

Cheiro and Benham wrote separately, but their accounts overlap on this one narrow theme: both connect the Ring of Solomon to an orientation toward mysticism or occult study, rather than to unrelated qualities like leadership, wisdom, or general success. That overlap is a genuine point of agreement between two classical sources on a specific subject. It is not evidence of consensus across the wider palmistry tradition — this article draws on only two sources, and other classical or contemporary authors may treat the marking differently or not at all.

The Ring of Solomon in context

Benham’s own reading already builds in a condition: he linked the marking to potential proficiency in occult studies only when other chirognomic indications in the hand support that reading, without naming which ones. Because that detail isn’t part of the verified text, this article doesn’t attempt to supply it. In practice, that means reading the Ring of Solomon alongside the rest of the hand rather than in isolation — the same general principle that applies to every feature covered on this site, and one Benham’s own qualification makes explicit here.

The marking sits directly on the Mount of Jupiter, whose broader traditional associations — ambition, ideals, and, again, an interest in mysticism and philosophy — are covered in the Mount of Jupiter article. That the mount and the ring share some interpretive territory in Cheiro and Benham’s writing is worth noting; this article does not go further and claim a specific combined reading between the two beyond what each source states on its own.

Common myths

“The Ring of Solomon means you have psychic powers.” Neither Cheiro’s nor Benham’s verified writing on this marking makes that claim. Their accounts describe an interest in or orientation toward mysticism and occult study — and, in Benham’s case, potential proficiency conditional on other features of the hand — not a standalone claim of psychic ability.

“The Ring of Solomon means guaranteed leadership, wisdom, or success.” This expansion goes beyond what this article’s two verified classical sources state. Neither Cheiro’s nor Benham’s account of this specific marking links it to leadership, wisdom, or success.

“If you’re intuitive, you must have a Ring of Solomon.” This reverses the tradition’s logic. A personality trait is not evidence that a specific hand marking is present, and the verified sources here don’t make that equivalence. Whether the marking appears on a given hand, and what it may traditionally suggest if it does, are separate questions from any trait a person believes describes them.

Frequently asked questions

What is the Ring of Solomon in palmistry? A named marking on the Mount of Jupiter, at the base of the index finger. Cheiro identifies it as a distinct mark on that mount; Benham describes it as a minor line with a specific path around the same area.

Where exactly is the Ring of Solomon located? Per Benham’s description, it begins in the web between the index and middle fingers, curves down around the Mount of Jupiter, and ends near where the life line begins.

Does the Ring of Solomon mean I have psychic ability? No — that specific claim isn’t part of either verified source used for this article. See the myths section above.

Is the Ring of Solomon rare or common? The two classical sources verified for this article don’t address the marking’s frequency across hands. Treat that as unresolved rather than assuming it is rare or common.

Do Cheiro and Benham agree on what the Ring of Solomon means? They overlap on one narrow point — both connect it to mysticism or occult interest — but they wrote independently, within their own systems. That narrow overlap doesn’t establish a broader consensus across the palmistry tradition.

What comes next

For the broader qualities the tradition associates with this area of the hand, see the Mount of Jupiter article. For how this marking relates to the palm’s other secondary features, the minor lines overview covers the site’s four dedicated minor lines and how much interpretive weight to give markings like this one relative to the major lines and mounts.

---

Sources consulted: Cheiro, Palmistry for All (1916); William G. Benham, The Laws of Scientific Hand Reading (1900).